A47A Cases (Updated)
- Format
- XLSX
- Version
- v1.0
- Notes
- Individual competition damages claims before the CAT, including case dates, status, duration and claim classifications.
Definitions and coding guidance for the variables used across the UK-CLAD datasets.
Limitations: CAT proceedings only (High Court claims are out of scope); most cases settle confidentially, so the data captures litigated outcomes rather than all disputes. See the codebook for detail.
DownloadChoose a sheet, then scroll through or search its contents.
Loading codebook…
No rows in this sheet match your search.
| Dataset | Format | Version | Notes | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A47A Cases (Updated) | XLSX | v1.0 | Individual competition damages claims before the CAT, including case dates, status, duration and claim classifications. | Download |
| 47B Cases | XLSX | v1.0 | Collective proceedings before the CAT, including case dates, status, duration and collective action type. | |
| Decided CAT Cases | XLSX | v1.0 | Final damages judgments, including case duration, funding, costs and damages claimed and awarded. | |
| Cost Judgements | XLSX | v1.0 | Cost rulings by procedural phase, including claimed and awarded costs, claim values and cost caps. | |
| Collective Actions Analysis | XLSX | v1.0 | Collective action parties, linking claimant type with defendant parent entity, size, location and industry. | |
| SMEs Analysis (with sectors) | XLSX | v1.0 | Claimant and defendant entity profiles, including organisation size, country, postcode and industry. |
This article presents the first comprehensive analysis of cases adjudicated before the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) between 2004 and 2025. Employing a structured coding framework to classify party types, case outcomes, durations, and other salient variables, it investigates the obstacles faced by consumers and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in accessing justice in UK competition law litigation. The findings demonstrate that structural and economic barriers, rather than doctrinal complexity, constitute the principal impediments to redress. The article details the study's methodological design and reflects critically on its strengths and limitations.
Read HereTwenty years of UK competition damages litigation, mapped case by case. Drawing on the full population of actions before the Competition Appeal Tribunal, this study asks whether the regime delivers on its promise of access to justice — and finds the decisive barriers are economic and structural rather than doctrinal.
Read Here